
Jyotisha
Practice
Spiritual
Lineage Teachers
A Humble Opinion
Lama Tsongkapa
(1357-1419):
founder of the Gelugpa School, surrounded by various biographical
scenes, with the Buddha Akshobhya.
www.brooklynmuseum.org
Tibet, 1800 - 1899
-- Collection of The Brooklyn Museum of Art
Letter
to a client
bewildered by the custom of reincarnation of
lineage teachers:
The issue of authenticating human reincarnationsof spiritual knowledge
lineage
holders is complex and almost completely non-rational.
-
Unfortunately at the
level where most of us live our daily lives, the official
decisions on
whether a given flesh body does indeed host the incarnated spirit
of
thus-and-so deceased beloved teacher, looks like simply a matter
of
theocratic opinion.
It looks like sheer politics. And
it does have a
political component.
But, it's a bit deeper, too.
Tibet was a tantrik society, where perceptions we consider
paranormal
are completely day-to-day normal. Trained lamas used
advanced siddhis (magical powers/highly advanced psychic techniques.)
Imagine your budding
psychic powers being trained from childhood, uninterrupted by
anxiety or
fear. Imagine how profound and trustworthy your psychic
capabilities would
be, after years of wise guidance by senior teachers who really
loved you.
Now if you combine advanced psychic capabilities with deep
emotional
neutrality and a rigorous philosophical education, you would get
a caste of
seers who could look down the pipeline of past teachers, and look
up the pipeline of future teachers, and see -- using intuition, omens,
dreams,
prophecies stored in poems, etc. - where the new incarnation
would occur.
But the *most* important guiding system they use is actually
love. The
lamas who go out looking for the new incarnation are motivated by
a profound
love of their old teacher.
They want him back, they crave
his affection and
his wisdom. Their motivation - when it is not eclipsed by
political
considerations - is normally very pure.
"My atheism, like that of Spinoza, is
true piety towards the universe
and denies only gods fashioned by men in their
own image to be servants of their human interests. "
~~ George Santayana
A
fallen teacher
can still be wise?
However, lamas are humans and they are not all happy. Some
lamas in every
generation would receive this incredible education, be completely
subsidized
by society and cared for patiently by senior teachers until they
reached
maturity - and they'd jump ship.
-
There are always some with
emotional
problems, addictions, other difficulties that block their
practice.
-
They
might have gone very far on the siddhi path, have lots of fancy
powers, and
yet some unpleasant karma forces them out.
If such a fallen lama would happen to arrive in the west and
begin to write
books, he could write very knowledgeably about identifying
incarnations etc.
However if he lacked pure motivation he would show that in
addition to
authentic knowledge he also had an ax to grind. When you
find
non-compassionate statements coming from the mouths/pens of
people trained
to exemplify compassion, this is usually what's happened.
And as always,
the bigger they are, the harder they fall.
My own (insignificant) opinion is that in the matter of H. H.
"Dalai" Lama or
any other beloved teacher, the proof is in the pudding. The
whole point of
finding reincarnations is to guarantee perpetual rebirth to the
teachings.
If the reincarnation in question is delivering the goods -
articulating high
teachings to high students, and spreading waves of generosity and
compassion
amongst the rest of us - then he's obviously hooked into some
divine power
source. That's real enough for me!
-
H. H. himself says he won't incarnate in the future, because the
system has
served its purpose. Some people (mainly Tibetans) interpret that
to mean
that he has reached total divinity. I interpret it to mean
that there are
now better ways to guarantee the survival of the teachings.
In the Tibetan
era 800-2000 AD, this peculiar system of storing huge knowledge
bases in a
few thousand short-lived human bodies in every generation, and
then trying
desperately to relocate the knowledge by relocating the new body
of the old
personality that remembered it, was the only known way to
preserve the
dharma. The vedic civilizations of India, which previously
hosted this
knowledge base, didn't use the breadcrumb-trail style of
reincarnation-finding at all. And we in the west who are
the new hosts,
will not use it either.
However I do think H. H. is the real McCoy, both in technical Tulku talk, and in authentic healing powers. He is *very* accessible in
meditation, so if
you would like to ask him questions directly, feel free to
conjure his image
and ask him personally. His signals are perfectly clear,
and his communication server never goes down!
For good clear Buddhist writing by a card-carrying vajrayana
Lama, brimming
with openness and compassion, I greatly recommend Sogyal
Rinpoche's "The
Tibetan Book of Living and Dying ." (Actually it's mainly written by
Andrew Harvey,
but Andrew himself has also got the "view.")
And
of course virtually all of H. H. "Dalai" Lama's books and tapes - especially the
tapes because it's lovely
to hear the healing tones of his voice - are authentic
expressions of
vajrayana. Thich Nat Hahnis also profoundly
healing.
If it's real Buddhism you're after then it should always have the scientific
effect of
making you feel (1) more compassionate and (2) more
peaceful. Buddhist
practices - when they're working properly - integrate and heal
both inner
(peace) and outer (compassion.)
|
H.H. Dalai Lama. (1994).
The
Path to Enlightenment. Glenn H. Mullin (Trans. Ed.):
-
At the moment the world's spiritual traditions have greatly
degenerated.
-
It is very important in such times that the practitioners
themselves make especially strong efforts to gain realization.
-
To permit the
lineages of transmission to disappear is to allow the world to plunge into
darkness.
|
Moral basis from
religious
belief and practice will ground psychic readings and healings:
In my view, all psychics must have a non-judgmental religious
basis firmly
in place *before* they offer readings to others.
-
Any
religion will work
just fine. Christian forgiveness, Islamic surrender, Jewish
acceptance,
Hindu devotion, or Buddhist compassion - are all fine, loving,
healing
principles to guide a reading and help the reader choose the most
healing
vocabulary.
-
It also helps to have what the Hindus call
one's "ishta-devata"
or personal manifestation of God to call on in times of need, and
to
maintain a global healing energy during readings.
An ishta-devata might be
Christ, Gautama Buddha, Tara, Mother Mary, Saraswati, Ganesha, Guan Shr Yin, Saint
Anthony, Elijah, Mohammed, or your favorite Saint. (Should
be someone
pretty high up there.)
A reading can be a powerful moment of truth - as you noticed in
the young
woman who ended her relationship based on your tarot
reading. Now, who
should take the credit for the power of that reading? Who
should take the
blame?
-
If you are grounded in religious/spiritual
understanding, you would
know that you had been the clearest possible vessel for
transmitting her own
truth to her. Certainly *you* (your personality) formed the
observations
and chose the words.
-
But the truth was requested by her,
and received by
her. You're just the transmission station. Readers don't
create information and healers don't create cures. They just purify themselves
to the point
where information and cures can move *through* them.
However, I disagree with some major psychic teachers when I say
that as a
reader you *are* responsible here. Not responsible to the
readee, but
rather - profoundly - responsible to yourself.
Lewis Bostwick, who was a very wonderful psychic guru, used to make
his
students chant "Not My Problem!" whenever guilt energy
(over the disruptive
effects readings/healings were having on people) started to drain
the
readers.
That was a wonderful tonic. It made
everybody lighten up, have a
good laugh. How people understand or act on the psychic
info that you give
during a reading, really isn't your problem. They asked for
the reading,
they got it - and your job is done. At this level, Lewis
was right.
-
But at a higher level of how much progress you make in your own
incarnation,
how close you get to God and how well you guarantee that you can
stay close,
well, at that level, there is a *lot* of responsibility.
-
Not to be
confused with "Serious Energy" which is
the antidote to joy!
-
There is plenty of joy at the higher levels
of spiritual responsibility : )
At
that higher level of responsibility, the
spiritual aspirant will want to *constantly* be tuning into
higher powers
and *constantly* attending to job of releasing fear.
The purer
she gets, the
closer to God she will be. AND - if she happens to be both
a spiritual
aspirant and a reader -- the purer she gets, the more accurate
her readings.
As the mere transmitter of the information, are we readers
responsible
for giving good readings?
Yes, I think we are.
We are
responsible for
aligning with the higher powers, seeking counsel from them, and
silently
dedicating each reading as a holy offering to those who guide
us. We are
definitely *not* responsible for the *results* of our most
grounded, most
faithful readings on the people who asked for them.
That
effect is
supervised from above, and it would be complete hubris for us to
try to
control it.
Thich Nat Hahn
|
"Compassion is the desire
for another to have freedom from suffering.
Loveis the desire for another to have happiness."
~~
H. H. Dalai Lama
|
|
Generous Wisdom : Commentaries by
H.H.
Dalai Lama XIV on the Jatakamala Garland of Birth Stories.(1992). Tenzin Dorjee
(Trans.) Dudjom Rinpoche (Ed.).
Agastya's Desires
"...we find Agastya, born to a
family of Brahmans so illustrious as to be called "an ornament of the
earth," living as an ascetic on the island of Kara in the Indian
Ocean....
"On what accomplishment have you set your hopes?" Indra
asked Agastya the Bodhisattva.
"What is the object of your wishes that
has led you to leave your sorrowful friends and relatives, desert a
household and possessions that had been your happiness, and enter this way
of life that destroys all pleasures?"
The Bodhisattva replied according
to the Dharma, in a way that immediately laid Indra's anxiety to rest.
-
"Repeated births tend to great sorrow," he said.
-
"So do the
calamities of old age, sickness and death.
-
All are just a disturbance to the
mind.
-
My vow is to save all sentient beings from these evils."
Relieved, Indra immediately
offered, in return for such candid truth, the fulfillment of any desire
Agastya might name. "May the fire of covetousnessthat burns
insatiably even after obtaining a beloved wife, children, power and riches
never enter my heart," Agastya said.
"Excellent,
excellent," applauded Indra and urged Agastya to request the
fulfillment of still another desire.
"May the fire of hatred burn
far from me," Agastya said. Pleased by this game, in which Agastya so
ingeniously taught the Dharma while appearing to request the fulfillment of
his desires, Indra urged him to go on.
-
But this time he was startled to hear
Agastya's words. "May I never hear, see, speak to, nor endure the
annoyance and pain of staying with a fool," Agastya said.
"What do
you mean?" Indra asked. "Those in distress deserve sympathy; the
root of distress is foolishness. How can you claim to be compassionate when
you abhor the very presence of those most due sympathy?"
Then Agastya reasoned in this
way, to prove to Indra that one should associate not with the foolish but
with men of wisdom. "A fool cannot be cured even by medical
treatment," he said.
"Habituated to wrong conduct because of a
deficiency in moral education, he urges his neighbors to follow his
impetuous way, inflamed by self-conceit and the affectation of wisdom.
"How true," Indra said. "Let me hear more jewel-like, well
spoken sentences."
"May I see, hear, live with
and converse with a wise man," Agastya said, "for these reasons:
because the wise man, walking the path of virtue, draws others along with
him, and is never roused to impatience by harsh words spoken for his own
good."
Again Indra was delighted."
|
|
from H.H.
Dalai Lama. (2002).
The Pocket Dalai
Lama .(Compiler, and Ed.).
Jesus Christ and the Buddha
"When we compare two ancient spiritual traditions like Buddhism and
Christianity, what we see is a striking similarity between the narratives of
the founding masters:
in the case of Christianity, Jesus Christ,
and in the
case of Buddhism, the Buddha.
I see a very important parallel: in the very
lives of the [founders] the essence of their teachings is
demonstrated.
-
For example... the essence of the Buddha's teaching is embodied in the
Four Noble Truths: the truth of suffering, the truth of the origin of
suffering, the truth of the cessation of suffering, and the truth of the
path leading to this cessation.
These Four Noble Truths are very explicitly and clearly exemplified in
the life of... the Buddha himself.
I feel [it] is the same with the life
of Christ.
-
If you look at the life of Jesus, you will see all the essential
practices and teachings of Christianity exemplified.
-
And in the lives of
both Jesus Christ and the Buddha, it is only through hardship, dedication
and commitment, and by standing firm on one's principles that one can grow
spiritually and attain liberation.
That seems to be a central and common message."
|
|
~~ H.H.
Dalai Lama. (1994).
The
Path to Enlightenment. Glenn H. Mullin (Trans.
and Ed.).
Why a Guru?
"The actual method of cultivating the correct attitudes
towards the spiritual master is to practice contemplative meditation
upon the guru's good qualities and the beneficial effects that he or
she introduces into one's life.
By reflecting again and again on the great kindness the guru
performs, a confidence suitable for spiritual training under him or
her is born.
The spiritual master is the source of all spiritual progress.
-
In
this context, Geshe Potowa once said, "If even those who want to
learn a common worldly trade must study under a qualified teacher, how
much more so must we who seek enlightenment?
-
Most of us have come from
the lower realms and have no background or experience in the paths and
stages to enlightenment; and, if we wish to gain this experience, why
should we not study with someone qualified to teach us the methods
that develop it?"
In the beginning of his Great Exposition, Lama Tsongkhapa writes,
"The root of spiritual development is to cultivate an effective
relationship with a master."
-
When the roots of a tree are strong, the entire tree becomes
strong,
-
whereas when the roots are weak, the entire tree will remain
weak.
...We should engender respect such that we see the guru as a
Buddha. If we can do this, then we experience the guru as we would a
Buddha and consequently are sufficiently inspired to practice what he
or she teaches.
The instruction to see the guru as a Buddha is not unreasonable,
for in many ways the spiritual master is Buddha himself."
|
|
H.H. Tenzin Gyatso. (2006).Kindness,
Clarity, and Insight 25th Anniversary Edition.Jeffrey Hopkins (Trans., Ed.),
Elizabeth Napper (Ed.).
The Raw Materials are In-Born in Everyone
"...if you consider just the subtlest mind and the wind or energy
that serves as its mount, the mere factor of luminosity and knowing of the
subtlest mind itself as well as the energy associated with it Are what
will be transformed into the mind and body of a Buddha.
This is the mind that will turn into an omniscient consciousness--a
Buddha's mind; it is this mind which will be transformed, not some other
mind coming from the outside.
Even when we generate afflictive
emotions, the very entity or
nature of the mind is still mere luminosity and knowing, and because of this
we are able to remove the afflictive emotions."
|
|